Blockchain technology has gained widespread adoption in recent years due to its ability to provide a secure, transparent, and decentralized ledger. One of the key features of blockchain is that it is designed to be trustless, meaning that no single entity or authority is required to oversee or validate transactions on the network. While this is a fundamental principle of blockchain, it is important to note that not all blockchain implementations are created equal in terms of trustlessness.

Why Blockchain needs to be trustless

To understand why it’s important to first define what is meant by “trustless” in the context of blockchain.

At its core, a trustless system is one in which all parties can transact with each other without the need for a trusted intermediary.

In short, you don’t need a third-party organization/institute/person to validate and record the transaction on-chain thus increasing transparency, reducing costs, and enhancing security.

For example, in a traditional financial system, banks serve as trusted intermediaries that facilitate transactions between individuals and organizations. In a trustless blockchain system, on the other hand, transactions are verified and processed by a network of nodes that work together to maintain the integrity of the ledger.

While this may sound simple in theory, the reality is that achieving true trustlessness in a blockchain network is a complex and challenging process. One of the main factors that can impact the trustlessness of a blockchain is the level of decentralization that it employs.

Decentralization refers to the distribution of authority and control across a network of nodes, rather than relying on a centralized entity to manage and validate transactions.

In a highly decentralized blockchain network, there is no single point of failure or control, which can greatly increase the trustlessness of the system. In contrast, a blockchain that is more centralized and controlled by a small group of actors may be less trustless, as those actors could potentially collude to manipulate the ledger or prioritize their own interests over those of the network as a whole.

Another factor that can impact the trustlessness of a blockchain is the consensus mechanism that it employs.

The consensus mechanism is the process by which nodes on the network come to an agreement about the state of the ledger, and there are several different approaches to achieving this consensus.

Different types of Consensus mechanism

Some of the most common types of consensus mechanisms used in blockchain technology are :

Proof of work (PoW)

Proof of Work is the most well-known consensus mechanism and is used by Bitcoin and many other cryptocurrencies. It works by requiring miners to solve a complex mathematical problem to validate a block of transactions. The first miner to solve the problem and add the block to the blockchain is rewarded with newly created cryptocurrency. PoW is considered a secure consensus mechanism, but it requires a lot of computational power, which makes it resource-intensive and slow.

Example: In the case of Bitcoin, the current difficulty level for solving the PoW algorithm is 18.67 trillion hashes per second, and the network consumes about 132 TWh of electricity per year.

Proof of stake (PoS)

Proof of Stake is a consensus mechanism that requires validators to hold a certain amount of cryptocurrency to validate transactions. Validators are chosen based on the amount of cryptocurrency they hold. This mechanism is considered more energy-efficient than PoW, as it does not require as much computational power. However, it has been criticized for favoring the wealthy, as validators with more cryptocurrency have a greater chance of being chosen.

Example: Ethereum is currently transitioning from PoW to PoS. The minimum amount of Ether required to become a validator is 32 ETH, which is currently worth around $76,000.

Proof of History (PoH)

Proof of History is a consensus mechanism used in the Solana blockchain that provides a verifiable and low-cost clock for the network. It enables high transaction throughput with low latency and low fees, enhances security, and is designed to be energy-efficient. PoH creates a cryptographically verifiable proof of the passage of time, which is then used to order transactions in the network. Validators are required to stake SOL tokens to participate in the network, incentivizing them to act honestly. PoH’s efficiency, scalability, and security make it a promising consensus mechanism for the future of blockchain technology.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)

Delegated Proof of Stake Delegated Proof of Stake is a consensus mechanism that combines elements of PoW and PoS. It works by allowing token holders to vote for a set of delegates who are responsible for validating transactions. The delegates are then rewarded with newly created cryptocurrency. This mechanism is considered more efficient than PoW and PoS, as it does not require as much computational power or cryptocurrency. However, it has been criticized for being more centralized, as the delegates have a lot of power in the network.

Proof of Authority (PoA)

Proof of Authority (PoA) Proof of Authority is a consensus mechanism that relies on a set of trusted validators to validate transactions. Validators are chosen based on their reputation and trustworthiness. This mechanism is considered more efficient than PoW, PoS, and DPoS, as it does not require as much computational power or cryptocurrency. However, it has been criticized for being too centralized, as the validators have a lot of power in the network.

A few Other less Popular Consensus mechanisms are:

• Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT): This consensus mechanism is designed to work in a network where nodes are known and trusted. It requires a majority of nodes to agree on the state of the blockchain.

• Federated Byzantine Agreement (FBA): This mechanism is similar to BFT, but instead of requiring a majority of nodes to agree on the state of the blockchain, it requires a majority of trusted entities to agree.

• Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET): This consensus mechanism is used in private or permissioned blockchains. It requires nodes to wait for a random amount of time before validating a block of transactions, with the node that waits the shortest amount of time is rewarded.

• Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG): This consensus mechanism is used in blockchains that are designed to handle a high volume of transactions. Transactions are linked together in a DAG, and each transaction validates two previous transactions.

In conclusion, while the concept of trustlessness is a fundamental principle of blockchain technology, not all blockchain implementations are created equal in terms of trustlessness. Factors such as decentralization and consensus mechanism can greatly impact the level of trustlessness that a blockchain provides. As blockchain continues to evolve and mature, it will be important for developers and users to prioritize trustlessness in order to build truly decentralized and secure systems.

If you liked this content, please show your support by clicking the ❤️ button as many times as you like. I will soon be posting about my tech projects, learnings, challenges, and personal philosophies. No credit card required!

You can connect with me at @Devendra_116